Monday, July 21, 2008

Readings for Monday 7/21

Thorne, S. (2006). New Technologies and additional language learning. Calper, 7. 1-26.

This article discusses contexts and application of technologies in second language learning settings, which include the synchronous computer-mediated communication, internet-mediated intercultural second language education, and internet-supported communities. It also reviews new technology and trials it faces in language learning.

As a primary teacher of Yugtun second language learners, it is exciting and confusing on how I would implement technology for the learning enhancement for my students. It would be challenging especially since I am not computer literate, and the technology terms do not have translations in Yugtun. The world is becoming technical, and in schools we have to become part of the technical culture. In order to do this, as a new generation of Yup’ik’s we have to come into a consensus of inventing new words for this new culture. Young students are now literate in using the gaming system, and will benefit in their language learning.

I like the idea of implementing chat into the classroom. This way the students who are very quiet will voice their learning, and it will give me a chance to learn student weaknesses. It will also allow for negotiating and focusing on form.

McFarlane, S. (2008). The laptops are coming! The laptops are coming! Rethinking
Schools, 22. 22-26.

A teacher who contests laptop use in the classroom writes this journal. It discusses who has the power to access technology, and who gains and loses in the technology of learning. The teacher who wrote this article sees the disadvantages of learning through technology in second language learners.

This is exactly what I was thinking would cause for learning of language in the classroom. Teaching precisely with computers may impend the learning of a language, unless it is modeled where there is communication. I believe that students who come from a limited speaking families of a target language should receive spoken input before computers are implemented to their curriculum.

Garcia, A. (2008). Rethinking myspace. Rethinking schools, 22. 27-29.

This article is written on how a teacher uses Myspace with his students. In Myspace he posts assignments, answer student questions, and uses it to cross barriers in schooling. Through this, the author connected to students outside of school.

I do not see how Myspace can be used for learning. Yes, it’s good the teacher keeps in contact with his students, but what is really the educational purpose of using Myspace? It is banned in our school district, but many students have computers at home, and they spend a lot of time on the website. I’ve viewed my sons spaces, and I didn’t see real communication. Maybe if they had a purpose, they’d type more.

No comments: